Staging a Ring cycle is probably a director’s most challenging enterprise: the plot is contrived; there obviously is a “message” to deliver, a message not restricted to a specific moment in time, but originally intended to a specific audience (i.e., the Germans); and an added insight, an opinion, a point-of-view is expected. But the philosophic side does not replace the scenic side of the task: you may read all the books or – easier – surround yourself with those very clever people who write the cryptic texts in the program, but if these ideas don’t make into the stage action – and they rarely do, for stage gestures have to be immediate to be effective* – then all that has been in vain.
I am sure that Andreas Kriegenburg has a plethora of ideas about the Ring – and he definitely has lots of ideas (and experience) about theatre in general, but I have the impression that “in general” is the keyword here. For instance, this is a production centered on people: the stagehands are visible, the stage effects consist of choreographies, in the end (I mean in the Götterdämmerung) the world as we know ends because it is not anymore about people and the “redemption through love” music is represented by the seid-umschlungen-Millionen white-clad group from the Rheingold in a collective hug on poor Gutrune. But the problem is that all this seems to follow its own plot while the singers playing Wotan, Siegfried, Alberich et al seem to be a burden the director had to bear in order to tell his story rather then being the story.
This has been more evident in Götterdämmerung than in the other operas: here the action seems to be set in Frankfurt – after all, the Rhine is nearby and the big euro-symbols (very much in evidence – Gutrune is usually seen riding one) in a bank headquarters’ lobby (the Gibichungenhall) seem to corroborate the hypothesis – not very far-fetched if you bear in mind that the Bundeskanzlerin couldn’t find time to go to the UN environment conference in Rio because the Euro was considered a priority over mother nature. Back to Wagner: as usual, the Gibichungen are shown as new money with ostentatious habits. Their corporative lobby is made of steel and glass, nature is reduced to a Damien-Hirst-style horse sculpture and a Patrick-Blanc-style vertical garden, there are many cleaning ladies in uniform sadistically molested by Gunther (Strauss-Kahn references?), while Gutrune plays the vamp to the executives who respond to Hagen’s calls to arms with mobile phones. However, nobody finds it strange when Hagen has a spear at arm’s length when one is “needed” or when Brünnhilde decides to burn Siegfried’s dead body just outside. What I mean is, the action is updated when the director has an idea about it. When he does not, things are carried out as in the libretto, regardless of how nonsensical it looks on stage.
There are staging problems too. The sets for the bank lobby are too complex to be dismantled and put together; therefore, a structure very similar to a barn was concocted downstage for all the other scenes. Forget about Brünnhilde’s rock – she has to make do with a bench in there. The norns too were transferred to the barn – plus a whole bunch of refugees from Fukushima (these sisters learn their never-ending wisdom from CNN here). The scenes that are too complex for the barn are basically set in the lobby – the Rhinemaidens make a short walk from the Rhine and “swim” on a gigantic Euro symbol. The end of the world too has not much room to happen: it is shown very far away upstage behind the lobby’s walls in a very believable pyre that does not affect much of the structure however. Hagen basically watches to the whole thing from one corner until he decides, for no specific reason, to shout, “hands off the ring!”, even if the ring had not been there for a while.
In musical terms, the performance is an improvement from the previous installments. First of all, the orchestra had a more immediately Wagnerian sound, in the sense that it was big, rich and very much in the center of events. Second, many of the atmospheric orchestral effects that misfired in the previous evenings here seemed more successfully achieved. Third, the pace tended to be more agile. Actually, when the score has a propulsive rhythmic figure to support it, Kent Nagano would respond to it more or less effectively, but as soon as the structure becomes more fluid, depending on the maestro’s beat to move forward, things tended to sag. But this is a fault one can find in many a conductor who ventures into Wagnerian territory. Although the orchestral sound was usually very beautiful, there were mismatches and the occasional blunder in the brass section too.
When Nina Stemme began to sing, she seemed to be in the Helen Traubel-ian shape she showed in Barenboim’s Valkyrie at La Scala: her middle register was at its most focused and even the low notes were rich and integrated, not to mention that she were handling her lines with almost Straussian fluidity. But – and that was a problem for Traubel too – as soon as things started to get perilously high, this warm-toned Swedish soprano had to push, a bad sign. In her second appearance, she seemed to have recovered and sang with amazing abandon. Act II is a tough piece of singing – and exposed high notes come in plenty. Pushing is something that works once, twice, but not three times in this kind of writing without evident loss of quality. At this point, many low passages were just hinted at, some consonants had been left to imagination, breath pauses started to grow in number and a couple of high notes were shortened. Although she was evidently unhappy about that (she appeared at curtain calls puffing in relief), she was able to keep up with the dramatic demands of the scene. Fortunately, Wagner gives the soprano some time to rest before the Immolation Scene, which she negotiated expertly until things became high and fast again. Then she proved to have nerves of steel and managed out of technique and willpower, for she was reaching the very end of her resources. This is the first time I see her in this opera and don’t know if she was below her usual form – it seemed her voice was dying to sing Sieglinde, so velvety and voluminous were his middle and low registers – but if the role’s high tessitura is usually that demanding for her, I ask myself if it is wise to sacrifice herself in the name of Wagner as she did today. Of course, I have seen sopranos who in their best voice weren’t able to offer something as appealing as Stemme did today, but a hard-day work it was and one could hear that. My respect for her commitment and professionalism – but I wonder if she had found any fun in it.
The role of Siegfried is basically too high for Stephen Gould. This tenor is a shrewd singer with a very solid technique and an untiring voice and thus he sang his part without any serious accidents. This is a basically unsingable role and the fact that a singer has sung it more or less like Wagner wrote it without giving the impression of being about to collapse is already something to be praised, but one who had heard Gould as Siegmund or Tristan wouldn’t recognize in the rather taut vocalism and pinched high notes his customary warm tonal color and poise in strenuous passages. As he was more occupied with getting the job done, his interpretation was restricted this evening mostly to stage action – he has a congenial stage presence and could follow the director’s comedy touches without making them extraneous.
Attila Jun was a very dark-toned Hagen who relished the bad-guy routine with some very earthy singing, but who could be tremulous in some moments. Although Wolfgang Koch could do with less off-pitch effects, his Alberich is sung with such conviction and richness of voice that he can’t help sounding convincing. Iain Paterson was a cleanly sung Gunther – the voice has a restricted tonal palette in this repertoire, but he uses the text expertly and is a very good actor, with a Michael Caine-ian attitude that made the role more interesting than usual. Anna Gabler has developed since I last saw in this role – the voice sounds bigger without any loss of roundness. The direction made the role rather incongruent, but she embraced the directorial choices, relishing the vamp-ish moments. Michaela Schuster was an expressionistic Waltraute, very wide-ranging in interpretation, her mezzo easily projecting in the hall. The Rhinemaidens were exemplarily sung (again Okka von der Damerau is a name to keep in mind), the norns not particularly so (Jamie Barton excepted – a truly beautiful, interesting voice). Since the promising Irmgard Vilsmaier (3rd norn) is being upgraded to the role of Brünnhilde in some quarters and had a bad time with her high notes this evening, I wonder if she shouldn’t make a complete check-up in her technique while it is still time. As Julia Varady once said, a soprano should always sing something like Donna Elvira’s Mi tradì now and then and she’ll see if something is not working properly. Finally, the Chorus of the Bavarian State Opera offered aptly sung with raw energy and commitment.
* I don’t mean that the concept has to be simple – it might be complex as you wish, but what you see on a stage is only what you see on a stage. There are not footnotes on the supertitles.
What do you expect RML? The poor woman was so terrified of yet again having her mid-range branded as “opaque” she threw her voice out of balance and struggled in the highs. You’re absolutely killing her.
In all seriousness, though, this strikes me as a generally satisfying musical performance, and especially so from Stemme. The highs were not easy for her even in the Scala Walkure and though in last weeks’ broadcast she seemed to have fewer difficulties than you describe here, it might just have been a matter of perception.* As to the future she must of course decide for herself but I can’t in all conscience hope that she gives up Brunnhilde. This is by no stretch of the imagination some sort of a failed experiment (of the sort RML is well aware of ) but rather the best Brunnhilde before the public today and possibly in at least 2 decades. She could almost certainly sing close to a dozen Rings in the next year if she so chose (I would think Bayreuth wouldn’t be averse to have her come in and salvage the situation) and yet she is singing only a few Siegfrieds at La Scala, one full Ring in Vienna and one Gotterdamerung in Munich (I hope to be at the last two but one can never be absolutely certain**). This seems to a good balance between keeping her terrific interpretation before the public and preserving her voice.
In any case, I’m glad the Ring seemed, musically at least, to have improved over the operas and that RML seems to have enjoyed it. I certainly hope more of these sorts of adventures will be forthcoming in the next year.
*The critic uniformly gushed but non, of course, offered the sort of detailed vocal analysis we come for to IHV, and by RMLian standards this seems reasonably good.
**There is a very very outside chance I might see this next week. If not I’ll certainly watch the livestream.
The setting was so place specific with all those designer names from outside in Maximilian Strasse flashing by that the original concept of das Rheingold was only be very briefly alluded at the end with the re-appearance of the white clad figures.
There was no dramatic trajectory to achieve that resolution. I missed the vivid theatrical imagination and artifice of Siegfriedand as you say the epic transformations were negated by the basic set.
Anchoring it as an identifiable power structure in the real world sort of puts a mundane boundary around it – and unless the action is believably carried through in all staging details with regard to time & place, which apparently it wasn’t here – it loses credibility. Just another rehash of suggested identities.
- O.K., even with her difficulties in 2nd Act (it is good to know that I am not going deaf yet since somebody else heard them, too) Stemme’s Götterdämmerung Brünnhilde is still as good as any I have heard recently – and better than most. But Father TIme is not on her side, either – in San Francisco just last year she negoitated those lower Act 2 modulations with more ease. I’m surprised I actually like her Brünnhilde so much since I never cared for her lyrical, much-tooted Isolde. In comparison, let us say, to another Swedish Brünnhilde – Dalayman – in the Munich audio broadcast Stemme did not quite give a full enough representation of Act 2 for my tastes – there were some lower tessitura fakings & she couldn’t cover it up, but Stemme’s Acts 1 and 3 were right on and better than Dalayman’s at the Met last season. Yes cavalier, it would be an all around advantage if Stemme participated in some of the next Bayreuth Ring – you mention her Walküre Brünnhilde – of all the 3 roles I have heard her do I am most fond of her Walküre Brünnhilde – her Todesverkündigung at La Scala was unforgettablie. But I am afraid Siegfried might prove too much of a stretch for her at this point in time.
- Hope the video broadcast this coming Saturday goes well!
Cavalier – Well, I see you are worried about YOUR fun, while I was thinking of Nina Stemme having to sing herself out to entertain you…! In any case, I was thinking – maybe she likes the tightrope feeling of singing a part that demands every ounce of concentration, technique and energy… Chi sa?
While I agree that she is one of the best Brünnhildes in activity – especially because of her deluxe “important” sound, I find it distracting when I can see that a singer is worried about what she or her has to sing. I don’t see that, for instance, in Irene Theorin. Her voice is less beautiful and less richer than Stemme’s, but she has this joie de chant, this “ha… now I’ll show them what a ho-jo-toho is about!”. It is not only a matter of vocal narcissism, but also the fact that – exquisitely sung as Stemme’s Brünnhilde at La Scala was – I felt that Theorin was more immediately moving. Vocal matters were far from her first concerns (because she didn’t have to – she knew it was going to work) – everything was about Musikdrama. Nota bene: those are two excellent singers, but I find Theorin more thrilling – in both her Valkyries here in Berlin, she made me forget about notes, everything was about Brünnhilde.
If you get to see this live in Munich, let me know!
Jerold – Yes, I agree that the Walküre Brünnhilde is the best suited to Stemme’s vocal nature and personality. To tell you the truth, my recent “desert-island” Götterdämmerung-act II Brünnhilde… was Evelyn Herlitzius in the Deutsche Oper. God – it seemed she would explode Siegfried with the intensity of her acuti. I remember then, when she sang “Gutrune heisst der Zauber,der den Gatten mir entrückt!”, I had the impression that all the furies of the universe had transformed themselves in dB.
Jerold and John – Yes, the development throughout the four operas was not very coherent, and I have the impression that this Götterdämmerung is what he wanted to do. In the other operas, he was basically telling the story of the libretto. Here, he had a point, but it was an a priori and he couldn’t transform it into a spiral of meaning in which points first shown in Rheingold would gradually pile up to end in the bank lobby in Frankfurt… So, yes, as Jerold said, the concept was only a straight-jacket for GD, while the previous three installments… basically had no point, but creative touches (particularly in Rheingold and in the first half of Siegfried).
Honestly, I think Madame Stemme is in greater danger of hurting herself in her struggle to receive an unreservedly positive review from RML than from the mere trivial exercise of singing a Ring Brunnhilde.
An unreservedly positive review is really frustrating – it seems as if you were not really paying attention and said “yeah, yeah – perfect. NEXT!”. I guess that paying unreserved attention is very flattering, isn’t it? For instance, when you write a text and somebody says “it’s very good – full stop”. Don’t you feel a bit like “has he really read it? what about that sentence that wasn’t really great? hasn’t he read it?!”. In any case, I am sure that Nina Stemme has more expert and reliable friends or something like that to tell her when something didn’t work now and then rather than reading blogs from unknown people. I have an actress friend (and, yes, she invites me every opening night to ask me what I think – I am one of “those friends” for her) who says: “An actor is supposed to be true to HIM or HERSELF – those who see the role in a similar way as he or she sees it will like it; those who see it otherwise will dislike it – but there will be something honest to be liked or disliked. When you try to please everyone, something that conforms to everyone’s tastes and opinions, than your performance doesn’t really mean anything to anyone”. There are many singers that I don’t like whose work I respect. Isn’t it like that with everyone in whatever we do? Aren’t there always colleagues at the office whose results you appreciate but with whom you would NEVER work because his or her style doesn’t match yours? So, c’est la vie…
Oh, RML, as the smiley face implies, I’m just kidding! Indeed, one would neither expect nor want such a thing (other than in one of those very rare cases where it was actually warranted) and as I indicate in my original comment (the first of 20 it seems) one looks for something much more probing and interesting at IHV.
Now I must away to catch my plane to Munich and see what happens there.
Cavalier, I know you’re just kidding – and I don’t need the smiley face to see that – but I thought it important to make a “statement” on the subject
On a further note, I think we’ve all seen singers who lacked either some or all of the volume, range, flexibility, color, endurance or other attribute of a given role which fatally compromised not only their musical but dramatic performance. As for “singing actresses”, dramatic talent, insight and commitment can make up for some vocal defects but by no means all and when possible such singer are to be avoided.
Obviously RML is suggesting no such thing about Nina Stemme. From the videos I can easily see the evident physical effort that certain portions of the Scala Walkure required (the initial Ho-Jo-Tos to start with) yet I find that they did not detract from her performance which I think both beautifully sung and enormously compelling. RML’s review was generally very positive also so I think I our disagreement her is fairly marginal one and a matter of slight divergence in perception and taste. Relative to Theorin (whom I saw in the theater at a Met Walkure) and Dalayman (Bastille) I really do prefer Stemme although I very much enjoyed the other ladies in the role. I don’t know how seeing Stemme in person might change that perception but thats my inclination, at the moment anyway. That said, while I do find Stemme (on the YouTube) more moving I did feel there was a certain joy and pleasure in Theorin’s performance that was missing from that of her compatriot.
All of that being as it may, I hope to hear all 3 ladies live in their roles in the next year and if this happy occurrence should come to pass might perhaps change my mind. Still, the presence of any on the Besetzung seems to me a reason to attend rather than otherwise. I hope RML will experiment further as well.
Jerold is of course absolutely right that time is not on Stemme’s side, but that is the case more or less with all singers, up to and including (though they had more time in this repertoire than most, Flagstad and even Nilsson). Still, as I note in my original comment, while Stemme is certainly taking some chances, it does appear that she is using some care in her scheduling and there is real hope that she will continue to give great very pleasure for at least a couple more years. (I do not mean to suggest that her career will by any means be over at that time or that she will not remain among the better exponents of her repertoire but unfortunately the luxurious quality of her sound is bound to deteriorate somewhat).
Not at all – you are right – I am not saying that Stemme is one of those singing actresses who make up for their limitations by sheer panache. She is a very solid singer. I only don’t believe that this role – especially in Siegfried – and her voice are a 100% natural match. I would say that, if she had been born in Italy and trained there, she would probably be the kind of dramatic soprano who sings La Forza del Destino, Manon Lescaut, Amelia, Aida in a good day (well, these are more or less her Italian roles, aren’t they?) rather than Turandot or Abigaille.
Sorry for the spam RML, one last thing.
The Theorin performance I saw was her Met debut. Stemme had done well at Cardiff, but for the most part it had taken almost a decade for her career. Theorin had been even slower getting on tracked. Theorin, Stemme’s almost exact contemporary, had made very few (any?) appearances on the world’s great stages and yet here she was, at the Met, performing under the baton of James Levine, opposite arguably the greatest Wotan of the prior generation. She had finally arrived. Others might have been tentative, or nervous in such a situation but she seemed, as I write above rather joyful (which is of course an appropriate attitude for Brunnhilde at the beginning of Act 2). Moreover, that joy was seemingly amplified by her confidence in her ability to sing the role and to perform in that setting.
Your spamming flatters me, Cavalier
Please spam whenever you feel like it.
Yes, that’s exactly the point with Theorin. This role basically works for her. Remember Sutherland singing stuff like “La Sonnambula”? Almost everybody has this “se non moro un prodigio sarà”-expression while singing it, while Sutherland sped through it without giving a second thought. It’s unfair, but that’s life…
I’m not sure I got on all the tracks in these comments – alas, I don’t know how to put a smiley face into a comment, but cavalier (as usual) got the biggest giggle out of me.
- rml you have grabbed my curiorsity about Theorin, the only one discussed above I have never heard sing Götterdämmerung – was it better than her Walküre & Siegfried at the Met and København (which I did see and hear)? Unfortunately I didn’t appreciate her Brünnhilde enough to follow her into Walhalla’s flames. She is a puzzle for me because when I heard her a decade or so ago singing the Italian rep in København (particularly as Desdemona in 2001) I couldn’t get over how wonderful she was – her lirico-spinto tone had a shimmering incandescent quality to it – but in her more recent forays into the Wagner rep I don’t care for her tone or technique. I can’t figure it out (perhaps Father Time reared his ugly head again).
- Herlitzius is my favorite of all of them mentioned above. She is a great singing actress and on a good night she still has that melting liquid-silver smoothness in her mid-range.
- Thanks for posting all those comments – good reading – and best wishes to you both!
Irmgard Vilsmaier as third norn has really had no problems with her high notes. It will be interesting to hear her first Brünnhilde in Götterdämmerung in Stuttgart in January. All musicians in Munich had a high quality
Sorry, Jerold! I thought I had answered your comment, but… Wel, I have never heard Theorin live in Götterdämmerung. As far as I understand, her voice used to be purer in tone in her pre-Brünnhilde days. Today it is no longer exactly beautiful, sometimes it is metallic and/or overvibrant and lower middle/lower register has a strange sound (I once wrote “as if she were singing in her cheeks” and I remember that it rang a bell for you) – my point is that – all that said – she does not seem fazed or challenged, even when it is not truly ingratiating. I would add that she is a singer who has to be seen live – because of the physical effect of her voice in the hall (differently from Stemme, whose velvety tone caresses the microphone – it is also exciting to see her fill the whole hall with her voice anyway). My experience with Theorin live is of someone really absorbed into her role. In the last two Walküren in the Schiller Theater, there was emotion generously oozing from her and René Pape in act III. The first one (in which Pape was in good voice) had no dry eyes in the auditorium. Nobody was analyzing anything then – there was no fourth wall that evening, it was like witnessing something like real life, but larger than life