Die Frau ohne Schatten is arguably Richard Strauss’s most formidable score, composed to Hugo von Hofmannstahl’s most complex libretto, the symbolism of which is almost awkward in its multiple levels. Magic opera, psychological drama, myth, social analysis… there is plenty to choose in it. To make things more difficult, the music is some sort of Straussian showcase – from the multicolored chamber music atmosphere of Ariadne auf Naxos to the all-together-now hysteria of Elektra. That operatic Goliath does not seem to have intimidated Zürich’s small but brave opera house, though.
Although director David Pountney believes that the work is about the discovery of one’s own humanity, he seems to focus his staging on the social disintegration caused by the exploitation of working class in the early day of capitalism, more of less Hofmannsthal’s lifetime. Thus, the story is set on the decline of the Habsburg monarchy. While the Emperor and the Empress are here shown as k. u. k. aristocrats, Barak and his wife are proletarians in a sewing workshop. The Nurse is a key figure in this context, since she is portrayed as something like a less fortunate relative who depends on her patrons’ favors (therefore, her interest in the Empress comes through more like self-interest than in other stagings). The magic elements of the plot are not abandoned, however. The surrealistic aesthetics of Max Ernst serve as inspiration to dream-like costumes and sets. Many ideas come through quite effectively, such s the play-in-the-play seduction of the Dyer’s Wife, where the Amme literally stages the poor woman’s romanesque fantasies (it is truly amazing how the music fits this concept), but many a detail ultimately seem unintentionally comical, such as the ballet-dancer falcon (why people feel that they have to bring the “voice of the falcon” to the stage?) or the walking dolls cloaked in white who are supposed to be the Ungeborene… If the many imaginative touches do not make an unforgettable experience, poor direction of actors is to blame. The cast did not seem comfortable with what they had to do and most scenes gave the impression of a routine followed with little conviction and almost no coherence: the tenor’s approach was stand-and-deliver, the baritone offered naturalistic acting and both sopranos seemed entirely lost. Only the mezzo seemed to invest the stylized acting required from her.
Franz Welser-Möst similarly eschewed any larger-than-life quality in his reading. The Opernhaus Zürich has a small auditorium and its orchestra is used to produce leaner sounds. Moreover, the conductor professes that Straussian style should involve lighter textures over which the text can still be easily followed by the audience. Let’s call it the “Cosi-fan-tutte golden rule”. I have to confess that I took some time to adjust to the undernourished orchestral sound, especially in what regards the string section. There was transparence in plenty, but the fact that the sound never ever blossomed even in the orchestral interludes finally robbed the music of a great deal of its impact. The end of act I sounded particularly deprived of substance. That could be overseen, if volume had been replaced by accent (as Marc Minkowski has showed us in his performance of R. Wagner’s Die Feen at the Théâtre du Châtelet), but, alas, the lack of forward movement and a sameness in what regard phrasing all in favor of orchestral polish finally suggested overcautiousness. The Mozartian poise had its advantages – a particularly clean ensemble in the difficult act II closing scene – but I am not really sure if this is how FroSch should sound.
The role of the Kaiserin is a bit high for Emily Magee, who had to chop her phrases too often to prepare for the next dramatic high note. However, her creamy soprano is a Straussian instrument by nature and, even when tested, she never produced a sour note during the whole opera. Jenice Baird was a puzzling Färberin. I have never heard her in such good voice – she really sang the part in her rich vibrant dramatic soprano, but seemed to be sleepwalking in the interpretative and dramatic departments. Her rather slow delivery of the text drained the Färberin music of all its bite. Although Birgit Remmert was quite overparted as the Amme, the size of the hall helped her to produce the right effect in this role. She has spacious low notes, clear declamation and, even if her top register is a bit strained, that did not prevent to produce some firm acuti. I know: Roberto Saccà’s voice is ugly, but I must say that I have never listened to anyone sing this part with such flowing lyricism, nuance and ringing top notes before. He almost convinced me that the role should be cast with jugendlich dramatisch voices. Michael Volle was extremely well cast as Barak – his spacious baritone is extremely pleasant on the ear and he sang sensitively throughout.
Rodrigo,
Speaking of Strauss, I want to buy a recording of the Der Rosenkavalier, but I don’t know what to buy. If possible, I would like a stereo recording, which eliminates Karajan’s recording with Schwarzkopf.
Where are your reviews? You probably put so much time on that and I will hate it to disappear.
Btw, I was looking for some translations of a few Bach cantatas I saw in one site your translation to Portuguese. That was awesome!!!
Rodrigo,
I should have added on my previous comment about “Der Rosenkavalier”, that I am curious about the Te Kanawa/Hendricks/von Otter/Haitink recording. Any word on that? Please feel free to suggest your recommendations.
Hi, Roberto!
1 – The Bach translations. Well, at the time I’ve worked on them it seemed like a great idea. Now there is a lot I would like to change about them, but have no time to do it. I guess it is a good idea that I don’t have the power to delete them. Otherwise, they would probably have the same fate of the commented discographies.
2 – Rosenkavalier. First of all, don’t buy the Haitink recording! As a matter of fact, there is no Rosenkavalier I would fully recommend, which is sad, I know. For conducting I would pick Böhm. For the Marschallin, I would pick Régine Crespin; for Sophie, I would pick, Lucia Popp; for Ochs, I would pick Kurt Moll. I won’t say my favorite Octavian, for I am entirely alone in my opinion. My safe-choice suggestion would be Carlos Kleiber’s second video – there you have a great conductor, a great orchestra, good recorded sound, a reference Ochs and a charming Sophie. Both Felicity Lott’s Marschallin and Anne Sofie von Otter’s Octavian are a bit pale for my taste, but they are certainly stylish and musicianly – and their voices are the opposite of ugly. With Varviso’s highlight CDs you could make up for that with Crespin’s best recorded performance in this role and an exemplary Octavian sung by Elisabeth Söderström, aided by again the Vienna Philharmonic beautifully conducted.
3 – The commented discographies. I know, I know… The new site is actually already being tested. I have tried to rewrite everything, but with little success – and I am not comfortable with publishing opinions which now seem a bit shallow to me today. I would probably delete the Puccini items for good – and feel tempted to do the same about the Wagner ones, but for the Lohengrin and the Tannhäuser discographies. But I haven’t decided it yet. My very good friend Lia, who is helping me to design the whole thing, says I exaggerate and that I should publish first and review afterwards.
Thanks for the reply, Rodrigo. I am listening to Solti’s Rosenkavalier and my impression is that it is a typical Solti recording, with its pluses and minus. I had hope on the Haitink’s recording.
I look forward to your new site. I don’t think anyone needs help on Puccini. That’s no brainer:
Tosca – Callas
La Boheme and Butterfly: Freni, Pavarotti.
Turandot – Karajan digital (for his Brucknernian conducting, which I found it was pretty interesting)
Fanciulla – Neblett
I found it interesting that you change your opinion towards a recording. In my case, whenever I listen to something that has an impact on me, I usually stick with it and even have prejudice with other recordings.
But there are some exceptions. For me, Bruno Weil’s recording was a reference for “Die Entfuhrung aus dem Serail”. Recently I listened to Solti’s recording and I was flabbergasted by Marti Talvela. Then I picked Bohm’s at my library and I was totally amazed by Arleen Auger and Kurt Moll. And now I don’t know which recording to listen… I guess I am totally out of context of your Strauss experience in Zurich message…
Roberto, you are one of my three or four readers – and I guess the other two or three will forgive us for the change of subject! 🙂
As for changing the opinion, it is not really changing – but developing your opinion. Whenever you listen to a new recording of a work, the relation established in the discography is altered. I usually have to retouch the whole discography when I add a new review, but sometimes the newcomer establishes new standards, by which the opinion on the older recordings has to be rewritten.
I would also add that repeated listenings tend to put things in perspective – something that seemed extremely important in the first listening can finally prove itself irrelevant in the 5th time you listen to it. That is why I think it is healthy to review the reviews from time to time.
The thing with re:opera is that now that I have to entirely republish it, I feel a bit uncomfortable about actively uploading things that I know beforehand to be outdated. On the other hand, my revision is not working as fast as it should…
Agree 100%.
As for the discography, I have an idea: you can publish it as it was on re:opera and add some notes on top of the review in the format of a blog.
For example, let’s say that on reviewed the Magic Flute and wrote that Lucia Popp was a great Queen of a Night but some reasons that you mentioned. Tomorrow, you will listen to another singer – who, I don’t know – that may change your opinion of the role and Lucia Popp. You may add something on the top of your review (as if it was a blog) about what you had written about Lucia Popp and the new singer, but wouldn’t delete the original review. This way, we have everything into perspective.
You are right that our opinions always evolve. I bet that Robert Parker may regret next year about something that he wrote today. One way of solving that is with electronic reviews in the format of blogs. Each review would be a true journal which would give the reader the whole story of how the reviewer developed his opinion.
Although, I have mixed feelings about allowing the readers to comment the reviews. It may turn to be a battlefield or interest debates. There are several newsgroups about opera on the internet and in my opinion you are, simple put, the best reviewer out there. I would say that I agree 90-95% of what you write.
You could even have links of the CDs that you reviewed to Amazon and – who knows – make a dollar here and there.
Btw, I bet you have many more readers than you think.
For everything that I read here, I´d say it´s easier Rodrigo start a madly loving relation with Cecilia Bartoli´s coloratura than change his (high) opinions on Lucia Popp… hehehehe
Roberto,
I am afraid I am too disorganized for that! And thanks for the encouragement! It’s really nice of you to write that.
André,
I plead guilty to that charge!